My first portfolio review was by Fig Taylor, a genuine
authority since she is an illustration agent and a. Her opinion was that my digital
painting style seemed to be my strongest work which is very time consuming for
me to do. Such work from me is rare and would deserve a client and subject that
I would have to be in love with. Her advice was “to take out work that others
can do better”, which is another way of saying be true to yourself; the main
problem with my portfolio was that it was having an identity crisis and I think
the reason behind this is that in my past projects I was obsessed with what the
client would want that I actually forgot about my own taste, and that really confuses
clients.
My second review was by the guys at Illustration Ltd. and they
were very kind and gracious. Again they took a liking to my digital work but
they did however explain that in today’s age it is important to use a
combination of traditional and digital for best results. The main advice was
that I should always have work within context, clients love to see work in its
final phase, be it a printed or screen captured so it’s not just the original
concept and sketch that people will see. It shows a level of professionalism
but an exception to this rule is not to have photographed work framed and on
display. A footnote of the exhibition is more than enough for your portfolio. Alice Ball gave me encouraging advice in
respect to what Fig Taylor said. A portfolio can still have a variety of styles
and experimentation, the key towards it being any good is to have a high and
consistent ratio of one particular style.

No comments:
Post a Comment